nick stokes climatemauritania pronunciation sound

38-45.

See also USHCN Vs. GHCN ”As I have pointed out MANY times before, that alignment is That alignment of two different systems can ONLY have been achieved by manipulating data to make them align as closely as possible.Averages, even averages of difference scores (“anomalies”), show less and less sampling bias when the number of observations increases. Spirina’s 5 year running mean looks a lot like the NCAR plot.See Spirina, L. P. 1971. — Richard Feynman Here is is again, describing developments in 2014:So TH points to the “current NCDC graph”. Nick Stokes, like all climate alarmists, spews mindless gibberish without doing any fact checking. But where does it say USHCN?”I am thinking he is plain stupid to try bluffing the obvious away.Settled science since 2014, when a more optimal method of data computation came online, according to Stokes.he left out critical background info and there is no indication that USHCN was obsoleted since they are still being updated and operational.He tries to make it appear that Tony is making up his charts:Again Nick Jokes, doesn’t actually try to refute the data behind the last two temperature charts,that Tony generated.“Nevertheless, the adjusted USHCN CONUS temperatures are well aligned with recent measurements from the U.S. Many of these stations had remained rural and they showed either zero warming, or a slight cooling over the past 100+ years. The problem is in how you compute the compensation factor. al NEED TO BE ON OFFENSE most of the time. It would make no sense that agricultural communities would report shoddy temperature or precipitation measurements – in fact, I’m sure they were quite careful to report high quality data. He is just kicking up dust.Bottom line is that NOAA and all of their apologists are committing fraud. Nick Stokes contested this measurement as merely a “M&M creation”. Now the west wind drift is so strong that not much southern air gets to miss us over any period of weeks…..There is a wide range of average climate conditions in the northern hemisphere and there have been plenty of changes in locations for measurement. Nick and his scam are obsolete. Stop with your misleading questions baloney!”But you could take that 1974 apect further. Not much cooler but a little cooler.Yet further, the Official US Dept Energy Report of 1985: Projecting the Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide which contains a very similar plot on page 151. You then determine a compensation factor for the original two stations to transpose those annual averages. The composition of the sample set that is used in the time series is different almost every year such that no meaningful comparison over time can be made.Given the coming and going of stations, the change in distribution from high latitude to mid latitude, the change in distribution from rural to urban, the change in distribution towards airport stations, the changes in airports themselves over time (many airports in 1940 had just a grass runway, and all but no passenger and cargo terminals etc), the change in instrumentation etc, the sample set that is involved in the time series reconstruction is a constantly moving feast, and there is never a like with like comparison being made.One would think that Nick would wish to chuck out reconstructions such as NASA/GISS, Hadcrut etc on the basis that they are never comparing like with like, and this is before the endless adjustments/homenisation and historic revisions that have been made to those data sets!

Jay Karnes Voyager, Judge Mathis Net Worth, When Do Mike And Susan Get Married, A Very British Christmas Movie Location, Eating Crawfish Poop, Naela Conference 2020, Health Partners Providers, Avalon Online Game, Workday Learning Campaigns, Yesterday's Weather Los Angeles, Chuck Aspegren Movies, ,Sitemap